Just because I’m paranoid about robots, doesn’t mean they aren’t trying to take over the world. I just learned that in the great city of Tokyo, Japan a robot is running for mayor of the western part of the city, called Tama. The robot, who suspiciously doesn’t have a name, promises to be “fair and balanced” to the people. The robots campaign slogan is, “Artificial intelligence will change Tama city.”
The silver robot is designed to look like a woman. I’m guessing that is to make it look less threatening to voters. Although instead of a traditional Japanese hairstyle, it has a sleek looking mohawk. I also can’t help but notice that the female robot candidate has D cup-sized breastplates. Good for her. That should be worth a few votes. I guess the Japanese voters have never seen the Austin Powers movie in which fembots attack him with guns poking out of their breasts. It was only his mojo that saved him from that booby trap.
The proposed robot mayor is being promoted as an improvement over a regular human politician because it can analyze petitions put forth by the citizenry and propose solutions based on irrefutable data as opposed to the biased, self-serving manipulation of information concerning the request. Thus, the robot could logically and fairly condemn you to be a robot slave for the rest of your life in the best interests of the community.
Some have criticized the idea of a robot mayor because the robot is programmed by someone else to do its bidding. But, really, how is that different from a human politician’s campaign manager? At least an artificial candidate doesn’t come with all the baggage that a human candidate has. For instance, you don’t have to worry about bimbo robot eruptions or a porn star announcing that she had an affair with the candidate sometime in the past.
Or do you? With sex robots becoming more and more popular, how do we know that miss Tokyo mohawk boob job isn’t a retooled former employee from a sex robot bordello? Robot candidate is a little too hot to be a politician. A female robot politician should look more like Hillary Clinton than Scarlett Johansson.
I’m also a little concerned with the campaign slogan. “Artificial intelligence will change Tama city.” And what does the robot mean by “fair and balanced?” If all human inhabitants of Tama city become slaves to robots, is that considered fair and balanced since everyone is being treated the same?” Artificial intelligence would change the city, just not necessarily in a good way.
Still, there would be some benefits to having a robot candidate. For one thing, you wouldn’t have to have those annoying teleprompters anymore. The speech would just be uploaded into the robot’s brain, so it wouldn’t be so obvious that the candidate was being programmed by someone else. Also, a robot wouldn’t have to worry about flop sweat like Richard Nixon had. A robot candidate would be as telegenic as Jack Kennedy.
A robot candidate could also campaign endlessly without getting tired or passing out while getting into a van or something. You wouldn’t have to worry about a robot candidate driving their mistress off a bridge in the middle of the night either.
Another ultimately cool thing that a robot candidate could do is that it could be programmed to be a voting booth. So, after the robot gave its campaign speech, you could just walk up and stick your ballet into its mouth.
Actually, the more I think about it, a robot mayor doesn’t sound that bad.




